Hendrex v. Philadelphia Indem Ins
| Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated |
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and CPH & Associates |
| 23-20220 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Hendrex v. Philadelphia Indem Ins |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Catherine L. Hanna for Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company in 23-20220 [23-20220] (CCR) [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 21 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/18/2023 for Appellants Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated. [23-20220] (DDL) [Entered: 06/08/2023 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20220] (DDL) [Entered: 06/08/2023 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20220] (Catherine L. Hanna ) [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Catherine L. Hanna for Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company in 23-20220 [23-20220] (CCR) [Entered: 06/05/2023 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20220] (Catherine L. Hanna ) [Entered: 06/02/2023 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-3734. Electronic ROA due on 06/12/2023. [23-20220] (ABT) [Entered: 05/26/2023 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings held. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-20220] (ABT) [Entered: 05/26/2023 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Ms. Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporatedfor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/25/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Bain; Attorney for Appellee: Hanna. [23-20220] (Joan Lucci Bain ) [Entered: 05/25/2023 05:44 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joan Lucci Bain for Appellant Recessability, Incorporated in 23-20220, Attorney Joan Lucci Bain for Appellant Janette Hendrex in 23-20220 [23-20220] (ABT) [Entered: 05/23/2023 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Joan Lucci Bain for Ms. Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20220] (Joan Lucci Bain ) [Entered: 05/22/2023 07:24 PM] |
| Filing 11 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [11] [23-20220] (CCR) [Entered: 05/15/2023 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/30/2023 for Appellants Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated [23-20220] (CCR) [Entered: 05/15/2023 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [5] NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated. [5] [23-20220] (RLL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellee CPH & Associates in 23-20220. Reason: confirmed w/counsel for Appellants that not party to the appeal. [23-20220] (RLL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Janette Hendrex and Recessability, Incorporated. [23-20220] (RLL) [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
