Williams v. Collier
| Anthony Cordell Williams |
| Brian Collier, Executive Director of TDCJ Institutional Division, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Chairman David Guiteriez, Director Pamela Theilkie, TDCJ Parole Division, Officer Unknown Scolfield, TDCJ Institutional Division, Officer Unknown Medcalf, TDCJ Institutional Division and Unknown Henderson, TDCJ Institutional Division |
| 23-20319 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Cordell Williams to proceed in forma pauperis [7] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 08/04/2023 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Requires MISC-14 and trust fund account statement. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 09/06/2023 for Appellant Anthony Cordell Williams [23-20319] (ABT) [Entered: 08/21/2023 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/05/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Anthony Cordell Williams because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 08/28/2023 for Appellant Anthony Cordell Williams. [23-20319] (RLL) [Entered: 07/27/2023 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (IFPPDC). [23-20319] (ABT) [Entered: 07/05/2023 06:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Cordell Williams [23-20319] (CCR) [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
