Gomez v. Demino
| Felipe N. Gomez |
| Wolfgang Demino and Honorable Judge Scot Dollinger |
| 23-20437 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 The Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez to add party Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka [ # 12 ]; or to add party United States Trustee [ # 12 ]; or to add both parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but not to substitutefor Appellant Gomez [ # 12 ]; or alternatively, to substitute Appellant Gomez with parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but keep Gomez as a Party in Interest, in 23-20437 [ # 12 ], has been made sufficient. Sufficient Motion deadline satisfied. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/08/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Cheryl Cummings, Proceeding Type and Date: Telephone Conference 08/03/2023. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 11/09/2023, for Cheryl Cummings. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 13 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to add party Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka [ # 12 ]; or to add party United States Trustee [ # 12 ]; or to add both parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but not to substitute for Appellant Gomez [ # 12 ]; or alternatively, to substitute Appellant Gomez with parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but keep Gomez as a Party in Interest [ # 12 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 12 SUFFICIENT MOTION FILED. Sufficient Motion deadline satisfied. REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez to add party Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka [12]; or to add party United States Trustee; or to add both parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but not to substitute for Appellant Gomez [12]; or alternatively, to substitute Appellant Gomez with parties Chapter 7 Trustee Frank Kokoszka and United States Trustee, but keep Gomez as a Party in Interest. Motion NOT Sufficient for the following reasons: Requires a Certificate of Compliance that list the word count of the motion; a Certificate of Conference that states opposing party's position on motion request; and the Certificate of Service must be edited to list the date & method of service used to serve pro se Appellee Demino. Instructions to Party/Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Motion due on 11/16/2023, for Appellant Felipe N. Gomez. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Status Report received 10/26/2023, from Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez, because we are unable to determine the relief sought. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. Transcript Order due 10/30/2023, for Appellant Felipe N. Gomez. [23-20437] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/13/2023 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/02/2023 for Appellant Felipe N. Gomez [23-20437] (MRW) [Entered: 09/15/2023 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Felipe N. Gomez [23-20437] (ABT) [Entered: 09/11/2023 04:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
