USA v. Narang
United States of America |
Harcharan Singh Narang |
23-20439 |
September 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Vacate Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Record Excerpts received 10/30/2023, from Appellant Mr. Harcharan Singh Narang, because the document is premature. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE. [23-20439] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/02/2023 08:57 AM] |
Filing 13 BRIEF IN SUPPORT in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 12 ]. Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [13] [23-20439] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Harcharan Singh Narang in support of for certificate of appealability [ # 12 ]. Date of Service: 10/30/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hu, Lowther; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell. [13] [23-20439] (Bingzi Hu ) [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:49 AM] |
Filing 12 MOTION for certificate of appealability [12]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [23-20439] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Harcharan Singh Narang for certificate of appealability [12]. Date of service: 10/30/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hu, Lowther; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell [23-20439] (Bingzi Hu ) [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:46 AM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bingzi Hu for party Appellant Harcharan Singh Narang, in case 23-20439. [23-20439] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/03/2023 09:28 AM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-20439] (Bingzi Hu ) [Entered: 09/29/2023 10:52 AM] |
Filing 8 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 10/30/2023 for Appellant Harcharan Singh Narang. Brief in Support due on 10/30/2023 for Appellant Harcharan Singh Narang [23-20439] (DDL) [Entered: 09/19/2023 02:45 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20439] (DDL) [Entered: 09/19/2023 02:45 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:23-CV-109; 4:17-CR-290-1. Electronic ROA due on 10/02/2023. [23-20439] (CCR) [Entered: 09/15/2023 01:09 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-20439] (CCR) [Entered: 09/15/2023 01:06 PM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Harcharan Singh Narang [23-20439] (ABT) [Entered: 09/12/2023 08:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Narang | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Harcharan Singh Narang | |
Represented By: | Joshua Sabert Lowther |
Represented By: | Bingzi Hu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.