Shinsho American v. TransPecos Banks
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shinsho American Corporation
Not Yet Classified: TransPecos Banks, SSB
Case Number: 23-20520
Filed: October 26, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Recovery/Enforcement
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2023 Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/26/2023 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB. [23-20520] (DDL) [Entered: 11/13/2023 09:27 AM]
November 13, 2023 Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20520] (DDL) [Entered: 11/13/2023 09:25 AM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Mark Curtis Taylor for Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB in 23-20520 [23-20520] (ABT) [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:59 PM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-577. Electronic ROA due on 11/22/2023. [23-20520] (ABT) [Entered: 11/07/2023 08:29 AM]
November 6, 2023 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-20520] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee/Cross-Appellant: Farrell; Attorney for Appellant/Cross-Appellee: Taylor [23-20520] (Mark Curtis Taylor ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:53 PM]
November 6, 2023 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Mark Curtis Taylor for TransPecos Banks, SSB for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20520] (Mark Curtis Taylor ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:51 PM]
October 27, 2023 Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/13/2023 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB [23-20520] (ABT) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:40 AM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Cross appeal filed. [4] Parties updated: Appellant/Cross-Appellee TransPecos Banks, SSB, Appellee/Cross-Appellant Shinsho American Corporation in 23-20520. NOA filed by Appellee Shinsho American Corporation. [4] [23-20520] (RLL) [Entered: 10/26/2023 02:41 PM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant TransPecos Banks, SSB. [23-20520] (RLL) [Entered: 10/26/2023 11:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shinsho American v. TransPecos Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Shinsho American Corporation
Represented By: Thomas Miles Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: TransPecos Banks, SSB
Represented By: Mark Curtis Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?