Larry FordIn re: Larry Ford
| In re: Larry D. Ford |
| 23-20525 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-20525] (DLM) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Larry D. Ford for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/27/2023. Fee due on 11/27/2023 for Petitioner Larry D. Ford. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 11/27/2023 for Petitioner Larry D. Ford, for damages under Rule 38 [2], for costs [2], Pre-judgment interest at the highest lawful rate [2]. Date of Service: 10/27/2023 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Excess pages, and has exhibits incorporated within the petition which must be separated. [23-20525] (DLM) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-20525] (DLM) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Larry FordIn re: Larry Ford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Larry D. Ford | |
| Represented By: | Larry D. Ford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
