Aframax Marine v. Suderman & Young
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Aframax River Marine Company
Not Yet Classified: Suderman and Young Towing Company and G & H Towing Company
Case Number: 23-20544
Filed: November 3, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other personal property damage
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2023 Filing 28 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Est. Completion Dt: 12/30/2023, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 11/30/2023, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 01/02/2024, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 07/14/2022 , Status Conference 08/30/2022 , Status Conference 09/01/2022 , Status Conference 12/20/2022 , Motion Hearing 01/18/2023 , Motion Hearing 01/24/2023 , Status Conference 01/30/2023. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 01/02/2024 for Mary Henry, Court Reporter [23-20544] (ABT) [Entered: 12/01/2023 11:01 AM]
November 30, 2023 Filing 27 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Benjamin Romero. [23-20544] (Benjamin Romero ) [Entered: 11/30/2023 10:03 AM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 26 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript order forms (3/18/21 and 1/6/22 hearings) received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company because the form indicates that the transcripts are already filed. The district court docket indicates that the hearings were ordered but have not been filed. [23-20544] (ABT) [Entered: 11/21/2023 12:42 PM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 24 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Gayle Dye. [23-20544] (Gayle Dye ) [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:38 AM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 23 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 07/14/2022 , Status Conference 08/30/2022 , Status Conference 09/01/2022 , Status Conference 12/20/2022 , Motion Hearing 01/18/2023 , Motion Hearing 01/24/2023 , Status Conference 01/30/2023. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 12/01/2023 for Mary Henry, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 17 ] [23-20544] (ABT) [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:19 AM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 22 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [23-20544] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bell, Cain, Herschaft, Letourneau; Attorney for Appellants: Chalos, Gaitas [23-20544] (Jonathan Michael Chalos ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 09:49 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 21 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [23-20544] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bell, Cain, Herschaft, Letourneau; Attorney for Appellants: Chalos, Gaitas [23-20544] (Jonathan Michael Chalos ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 09:49 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 18 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [23-20544] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Aframax River Marine Company advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bell, Cain, Herschaft, Letourneau; Attorney for Appellants: Chalos, Gaitas [23-20544] (Jonathan Michael Chalos ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 09:46 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 17 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Aframax River Marine Companyfor the Court to process. Date of service: 11/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bell, Cain, Herschaft, Letourneau; Attorney for Appellants: Chalos, Gaitas. [23-20544] (Jonathan Michael Chalos ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 09:43 PM]
November 13, 2023 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan Michael Chalos for Appellant Aframax River Marine Company in 23-20544, by Attorney(s) George A. Gaitas for party(s) Appellant Aframax River Marine Company, in case 23-20544 [23-20544] (ABT) [Entered: 11/13/2023 12:03 PM]
November 9, 2023 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-20544] (George A. Gaitas ) [Entered: 11/09/2023 10:57 PM]
November 9, 2023 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jonathan Michael Chalos for Aframax River Marine Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20544] (Jonathan Michael Chalos ) [Entered: 11/09/2023 10:42 PM]
November 8, 2023 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Keith Bernard Letourneau, Michael K. Bell, Zachary Cain for party(s) Appellee Suderman and Young Towing Company Appellee G & H Towing Company, in case 23-20544 [23-20544] (ABT) [Entered: 11/08/2023 11:03 AM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-20544] (Michael K. Bell ) [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:27 PM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-20544] (Zachary Cain ) [Entered: 11/07/2023 12:34 PM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20544] (Keith Bernard Letourneau ) [Entered: 11/07/2023 12:29 PM]
November 6, 2023 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 11/21/2023 for Appellant Aframax River Marine Company. [23-20544] (RLL) [Entered: 11/06/2023 12:51 PM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Aframax River Marine Company. [23-20544] (RLL) [Entered: 11/03/2023 04:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aframax Marine v. Suderman & Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Aframax River Marine Company
Represented By: Jonathan Michael Chalos
Represented By: George A. Gaitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Suderman and Young Towing Company
Represented By: Keith Bernard Letourneau
Represented By: Michael K. Bell
Represented By: Zachary Cain
Represented By: Jeremy Alan Herschaft Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: G & H Towing Company
Represented By: Keith Bernard Letourneau
Represented By: Michael K. Bell
Represented By: Zachary Cain
Represented By: Jeremy Alan Herschaft Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?