Diggles v. Surratt
| Latosha Diggles |
| Donean Surratt, David Fisher, Michael J. Lindsay, In his individual and official capacity, Barrett Philip Lindsay, In his individual and official capacity, John Pat Parsons, In his individual and official capacity, Eric B. Dick, In his individual and official capacity, Mitch Templeton, In his individual and official capacity, Baylor Wortham, In his individual and official capacity, Dana Marshburn, In her individual and official capacity and Holly G. Giffin, In her individual and official capacity |
| 23-20564 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 49 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alexander B. Wathen for party(s) Appellee Eric B. Dick, in case 23-20564 [23-20564] (AMD) [Entered: 12/21/2023 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 48 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20564] (Alexander B. Wathen ) [Entered: 12/19/2023 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 47 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [47] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-20564] (AMD) [Entered: 12/19/2023 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 38 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/14/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 41 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [41] NOA filed by Appellant Latosha Diggles. [41] [23-20564] (AMD) [Entered: 12/14/2023 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 36 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:23-CV-78 (PLEADINGS ONLY; motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense pending in 5CCA). Electronic ROA due on 12/27/2023. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 35 MOTION filed by Appellant Latosha Diggles to authorize preparation of transcript at government expense.[35] Transcript order deadline canceled for Latosha Diggles. Date of service: 12/07/2023. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 34 MOTION filed by Appellant Latosha Diggles to proceed in forma pauperis with incorporated financial affidavit. [34] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 12/07/2023. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 33 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/01/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Latosha Diggles. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 29 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/05/2023 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 27 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/01/2023 denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis and denying motion for transcripts at government expense Fee deadline updated to 01/04/2024 for Appellant Latosha Diggles. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/05/2023 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 24 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Benjamin Romero. [23-20564] (Benjamin Romero ) [Entered: 12/05/2023 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 23 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Benjamin Romero. [23-20564] (Benjamin Romero ) [Entered: 12/05/2023 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 22 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20564] (DDL) [Entered: 12/01/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 19 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process for additional NOA filed 11/17/2023. [19] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 17 Eric Dick is no longer designated as a pro se attorney. Reason:he is represented by counsel. [23-20564] (ABT) [Entered: 11/22/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alexander B. Wathen for party(s) Appellee Eric B. Dick, in case 23-20564 [23-20564] (ABT) [Entered: 11/22/2023 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 12 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [12] NOA filed by Appellant Latosha Diggles. [12] [23-20564] (CCR) [Entered: 11/22/2023 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 20 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Transcript at Government Expense received from Appellant Latosha Diggles because filing is premature as motion for transcript at government expense is pending in the district court. If motion filed in district court is denied, Appellant can reurge the motion in the Fifth Circuit. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:23-CV-78 (PLEADINGS ONLY). Electronic ROA due on 12/05/2023. [23-20564] (CCR) [Entered: 11/20/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kathleen Marie Kennedy for Appellee Holly G. Giffin in 23-20564, Attorney Kathleen Marie Kennedy for Appellee Dana Marshburn in 23-20564 [23-20564] (ABT) [Entered: 11/20/2023 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Kathleen Marie Kennedy for Ms. Holly G. Giffin and Ms. Dana Marshburn for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20564] (Kathleen Marie Kennedy ) [Entered: 11/17/2023 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20564] (Alexander B. Wathen ) [Entered: 11/16/2023 08:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 12/01/2023 for Appellant Latosha Diggles. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 11/16/2023 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Latosha Diggles. [23-20564] (RLL) [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
