Texas Truck Parts & Tire v. USA
Texas Truck Parts & Tire, Incorporated |
United States of America |
23-20588 |
December 8, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Tax Suits (Tax from DC) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant USA. Extension Granted to and including 03/13/2024. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 03/13/2024 for Appellant United States of America [23-20588] (GMC) [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:22 AM] |
Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/12/2024 for Appellant United States of America. [23-20588] (DDL) [Entered: 01/03/2024 10:31 AM] |
Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20588] (DDL) [Entered: 01/03/2024 10:30 AM] |
Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-2055. Electronic ROA due on 01/05/2024. [23-20588] (ABT) [Entered: 12/21/2023 03:23 PM] |
Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant USA advising transcript unnecessary Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-20588] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant USA advising transcript unnecessary Date of Service: 12/21/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Johns, Rennie; Attorney for Appellee: Probus [23-20588] (Douglas Campbell Rennie ) [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:04 AM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Douglas Campbell Rennie for party(s) Appellant USA, in case 23-20588 [23-20588] (TNM) [Entered: 12/20/2023 03:39 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Brian Probus for party(s) Appellee Texas Truck Parts & Tire, Incorporated, in case 23-20588 [23-20588] (TNM) [Entered: 12/19/2023 04:22 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew Brian Probus for Texas Truck Parts & Tire, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20588] (Matthew Brian Probus ) [Entered: 12/18/2023 05:19 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20588] (Douglas Campbell Rennie ) [Entered: 12/18/2023 12:22 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 12/28/2023, for Appellant United States of America. [23-20588] (DLJ) [Entered: 12/13/2023 03:25 PM] |
Filing 1 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant USA. [23-20588] (RLL) [Entered: 12/08/2023 04:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Texas Truck Parts & Tire v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Texas Truck Parts & Tire, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Matthew Brian Probus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Michelle C. Johns |
Represented By: | Douglas Campbell Rennie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.