Stevenson v. LA Supreme Court
| Daimeyahn Stevenson |
| Louisiana Supreme Court and Louisiana Appellate Project |
| 23-30079 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-30079] (MRW) [Entered: 03/03/2023 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:22-CV-3512. Electronic ROA due on 03/17/2023. [23-30079] (MRW) [Entered: 03/02/2023 08:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 04/11/2023 for Appellant Daimeyahn Stevenson. Brief in Support due on 04/11/2023 for Appellant Daimeyahn Stevenson [23-30079] (MRW) [Entered: 03/02/2023 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 7 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED filed by Appellant Mr. Daimeyahn Stevenson. [23-30079] (MRW) [Entered: 03/02/2023 07:59 AM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 03/13/2023 for Appellant Daimeyahn Stevenson - monitoring for signed notice of appeal. [23-30079] (AGL) [Entered: 02/09/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daimeyahn Stevenson [23-30079] (AGL) [Entered: 02/06/2023 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
