Richard's Clearview v. Starr Surplus Lines
| Richard's Clearview, L.L.C, and Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. |
| Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| 23-30130 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Richard's Clearview v. Starr Surplus Lines |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/05/2023 for Appellant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. [23-30130] (DDL) [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 26 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-30130] (DDL) [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 25 COURT ORDER denying Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. [ # 10 ] [23-30130] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/20/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 19 REPLY filed by Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. [19] to the filed by Appellant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company [ # 13 ]. Date of Service: 04/05/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Barousse, Voorhies; Attorney for Appellant: Thigpen. [23-30130] (William Andrus Barousse ) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION [13] to the Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. in 23-30130 [ # 10 ] Response/Opposition deadline satisfied. [23-30130] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company [13] to the to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. [ # 10 ] Date of Service: 03/30/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Barousse, Voorhies; Attorney for Appellant: Thigpen. [23-30130] (Lee Ann C. Thigpen ) [Entered: 03/30/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lee Ann C. Thigpen for Appellant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company in 23-30130 [23-30130] (PAC) [Entered: 03/23/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Lee Ann C. Thigpen for Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30130] (Lee Ann C. Thigpen ) [Entered: 03/23/2023 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 10 OPPOSED MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [10]. Response/Opposition due on 03/30/2023. [23-30130] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C. to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [10]. Date of service: 03/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Barousse, Voorhies; Attorney for Appellant: Thigpen [23-30130] (William Andrus Barousse ) [Entered: 03/20/2023 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Andrus Barousse for party(s) Appellee Richard's Clearview, L.L.C., in case 23-30130 [23-30130] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/20/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30130] (William Andrus Barousse ) [Entered: 03/17/2023 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:22-CV-2326. Electronic ROA due on 03/29/2023. [23-30130] (AGL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-30130] (AGL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company [23-30130] (AGL) [Entered: 03/08/2023 07:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
