USA v. Wadlington
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Grant Wadlington
Case Number: 23-30173
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30173] (Camille Ann Domingue ) [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:24 PM]
March 28, 2023 Filing 6 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Comment: Motion to appoint counsel. [23-30173] (MAS) [Entered: 03/28/2023 10:25 AM]
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Grant Wadlington [23-30173] (MAS) [Entered: 03/28/2023 08:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Wadlington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: John Luke Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Grant Wadlington
Represented By: Alfred Frem Boustany II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?