Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
Plaquemines Parish |
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris |
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Texaco, Incorporated and Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company |
23-30303 |
May 5, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 CLERK ORDER granting motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellants Exxon Mobil Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated [ # 25 ] in light of the court's order entered this date in case no. 23-30294. [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/26/2023 02:37 PM] |
Filing 25 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, Chevron Pipe Line Company, ConocoPhillips Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending resolution of case no. 23-30294. Date of service: 05/22/2023 [23-30303] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated and Chevron Pipe Line Company to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: Pending resolution of lead appeal, to suspend briefing notice dated 05/12/2023 [25]. Date of service: 05/22/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Carmouche, Marcello, Seidemann; Attorney for Appellants: Clark, DeShazo, Keisler, Kuchler, McNeal, White [23-30303] (Peter D. Keisler ) [Entered: 05/22/2023 09:32 PM] |
Filing 23 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Deborah DeRoche Kuchler for party(s) Appellant ConocoPhillips Company, in case 23-30303 [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/15/2023 08:10 AM] |
Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michele Hale DeShazo for Appellant ConocoPhillips Company in 23-30303 [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/15/2023 08:08 AM] |
Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30303] (Deborah DeRoche Kuchler ) [Entered: 05/12/2023 11:46 AM] |
Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Michele Hale DeShazo for ConocoPhillips Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30303] (Michele Hale DeShazo ) [Entered: 05/12/2023 11:39 AM] |
Filing 19 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/21/2023 for Appellants Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation. [23-30303] (DDL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 09:37 AM] |
Filing 18 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-30303] (DDL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 09:37 AM] |
Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Victor L. Marcello for party(s) Appellee Plaquemines Parish, in case 23-30303 [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:53 PM] |
Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30303] (Victor L. Marcello ) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:27 PM] |
Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes (no hearings). [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/10/2023 07:36 AM] |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.for the Court to process. Date of service: 05/09/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Carmouche, Seidemann; Attorney for Appellants: Clark, DeShazo, Keisler, McNeal, White. [23-30303] (Alexandra Giselle White ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:37 PM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jennifer Jo Clark for party(s) Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Appellant Chevron Pipe Line Company Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, in case 23-30303 [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:08 PM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Peter D. Keisler for party(s) Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Appellant Chevron Pipe Line Company Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, in case 23-30303 [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:06 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30303] (Jennifer Jo Clark ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:31 AM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30303] (Peter D. Keisler ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:22 AM] |
Filing 7 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Chevron U.S.A. Inc. in 23-30303. Update: corrected party text attached to Appellant Chevron USA, Inc.. [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/08/2023 10:31 AM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:18-CV-5227. Electronic ROA due on 05/23/2023. [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/08/2023 10:29 AM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-30303] (AGL) [Entered: 05/08/2023 10:24 AM] |
Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation [23-30303] (MAS) [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Plaquemines Parish | |
Represented By: | Donald T. Carmouche |
Represented By: | Victor L. Marcello Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Intervenor / appellee: Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Ryan Michael Seidemann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Intervenor / appellee: Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris | |
Represented By: | Ryan Michael Seidemann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Michele Hale DeShazo |
Represented By: | Deborah DeRoche Kuchler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company | |
Represented By: | Robert Beattie McNeal Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company | |
Represented By: | Alexandra Giselle White |
Represented By: | Peter D. Keisler Esq. |
Represented By: | Jennifer Jo Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Texaco, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Alexandra Giselle White |
Represented By: | Peter D. Keisler Esq. |
Represented By: | Jennifer Jo Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company | |
Represented By: | Alexandra Giselle White |
Represented By: | Peter D. Keisler Esq. |
Represented By: | Jennifer Jo Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.