Matthews v. Tidewater
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marek Matthews
Defendant / Appellee: Tidewater, Incorporated and Tidewater Crewing, Limited
Case Number: 23-30305
Filed: May 8, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Marine
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2023 Filing 21 OPPOSED CORRECTED MOTION to reopen case [21] Default Remedied. Replaces the motion filed 06/26/2023 Date of Service: 07/02/2023 [23-30305] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Marek Matthews to reopen case [21]. Date of service: 07/02/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Griffin, Maestri, Siahatgar; Attorney for Appellant: Morgan [23-30305] (Stephen Reed Morgan ) [Entered: 07/02/2023 02:59 PM]
June 1, 2023 Filing 17 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter. [17] [23-30305] (SEP) [Entered: 06/01/2023 08:34 AM]
May 18, 2023 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bijan R. Siahatgar for Appellee Tidewater Crewing, Limited in 23-30305, Attorney Bijan R. Siahatgar for Appellee Tidewater, Incorporated in 23-30305 [23-30305] (NFD) [Entered: 05/18/2023 01:28 PM]
May 17, 2023 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Bijan R. Siahatgar for Tidewater Crewing, Limited and Tidewater, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30305] (Bijan R. Siahatgar ) [Entered: 05/17/2023 02:07 PM]
May 16, 2023 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Elizabeth Fitzgerald Griffin for party(s) Appellee Tidewater, Incorporated Appellee Tidewater Crewing, Limited, in case 23-30305 [23-30305] (ABT) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:52 PM]
May 15, 2023 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30305] (Elizabeth Fitzgerald Griffin ) [Entered: 05/15/2023 08:25 AM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/24/2023 for Appellant Marek Matthews. [23-30305] (SEP) [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:06 AM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marek Matthews [23-30305] (AGL) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthews v. Tidewater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Marek Matthews
Represented By: Stephen Reed Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Tidewater, Incorporated
Represented By: Walter Patrick Maestri
Represented By: Bijan R. Siahatgar
Represented By: Elizabeth Fitzgerald Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Tidewater Crewing, Limited
Represented By: Walter Patrick Maestri
Represented By: Bijan R. Siahatgar
Represented By: Elizabeth Fitzgerald Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?