Darden v. Vines
Plaintiff / Appellant: O'Neil Darden, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: Robert C. Vines, in his individual and official capacity and M. Bofill Duhe, in his individual and official capacity
Case Number: 23-30700
Filed: October 4, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2023 Filing 21 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Record excerpts received from Appellant Mr. O'Neil Darden, Jr. because record excerpts must be filed separately from the brief electronically. [23-30700] (MAS) [Entered: 12/01/2023 04:04 PM]
November 29, 2023 Filing 20 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 12/14/2023 for Appellant O'Neil Darden Jr.. Appellee's Brief due on 12/29/2023 for Appellees M. Bofill Duhe and Robert C. Vines [23-30700] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. O'Neil Darden, Jr.. Date of service: 11/29/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Adams, Alexis, Moll; Attorney for Appellant: Romero; hand delivery - Attorney for Appellant: Jordan [23-30700] (Shane Errol Romero ) [Entered: 11/29/2023 09:44 AM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Glenn B. Adams for Appellee M. Bofill Duhe in 23-30700, Attorney Glenn B. Adams for Appellee Robert C. Vines in 23-30700 [23-30700] (PAC) [Entered: 10/30/2023 02:16 PM]
October 27, 2023 Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Glenn B. Adams for Mr. M. Bofill Duhe and Mr. Robert C. Vines for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30700] (Glenn B. Adams ) [Entered: 10/27/2023 02:30 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 17 Attorney Mr. Glenn B. Adams for Appellees Mr. Robert C. Vines and Mr. M. Bofill Duhe is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [23-30700] (LBM) [Entered: 10/25/2023 12:49 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Corey Moll for party(s) Appellee M. Bofill Duhe Appellee Robert C. Vines, in case 23-30700 [23-30700] (PAC) [Entered: 10/25/2023 08:22 AM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ralph Roger Alexis III for party(s) Appellee M. Bofill Duhe Appellee Robert C. Vines, in case 23-30700 [23-30700] (PAC) [Entered: 10/25/2023 08:20 AM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30700] (Corey Moll ) [Entered: 10/24/2023 03:03 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-30700] (Corey Moll ) [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:41 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30700] (Ralph Roger Alexis III) [Entered: 10/24/2023 02:19 PM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/04/2023 for Appellant O'Neil Darden Jr.. [23-30700] (DDL) [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:58 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-30700] (DDL) [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:57 AM]
October 6, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Shane Errol Romero for Appellant O'Neil Darden Jr. in 23-30700 [23-30700] (MAS) [Entered: 10/06/2023 04:57 PM]
October 5, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Shane Errol Romero for Mr. O'Neil Darden, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-30700] (Shane Errol Romero ) [Entered: 10/05/2023 04:36 PM]
October 5, 2023 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:22-CV-404; 6:22-CV-1398. Electronic ROA due on 10/20/2023. [23-30700] (MAS) [Entered: 10/05/2023 03:47 PM]
October 5, 2023 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-30700] (MAS) [Entered: 10/05/2023 03:44 PM]
October 4, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. O'Neil Darden, Jr. [23-30700] (AGL) [Entered: 10/04/2023 12:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darden v. Vines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: O'Neil Darden, Jr.
Represented By: Jonathan Glynn Jordan
Represented By: Shane Errol Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Robert C. Vines, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Glenn B. Adams
Represented By: Ralph Roger Alexis Esq. III
Represented By: Corey Moll Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: M. Bofill Duhe, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Glenn B. Adams
Represented By: Ralph Roger Alexis Esq. III
Represented By: Corey Moll Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?