Ovalle v. Saul
| Azucena C. Ovalle |
| Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
| 23-40013 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| DIWC / DIWW (Social Security) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 CLERK ORDER denying Motion to extend time to return a sufficient motion filed by Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle [ # 23 ] [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 03/06/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle to extend the time to return a sufficient Motion for reconsideration [ # 19 ] [23]. Date of service: 02/22/2023 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: certificate of service, certificate of conference, and certificate of compliance required [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 03/06/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 22 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle. Extension Granted to and including 03/13/2023. Sufficient Motion,Response,Reply due deadline updated to 03/13/2023 for Appellant Azucena C. Ovalle [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 03/01/2023 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 21 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to request a 40 day leave from the Court received from Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle because no such relief is available as this case has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant timely filed a motion for reconsideration with a sufficient due ddl of 2/24/2023. [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 02/23/2023 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle for reconsideration of the 01/20/2023 court order dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction [6] [19]. Date of service: 02/02/2023 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: appears to be incomplete, missing certificate of service and certificate of compliance Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 02/24/2023 for Appellant Azucena C. Ovalle [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No [23-40013] (DDL) [Entered: 01/30/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 16 COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional recommendation to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [7]. Mandate issue date is 03/14/2023. [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 01/20/2023 08:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: AA Recommendation to submit to court for jurisdictional review. Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 01/17/2023 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Azucena C. Ovalle [23-40013] (SDH) [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ovalle v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Azucena C. Ovalle | |
| Represented By: | Azucena C. Ovalle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Kerry Kemp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
