USA v. Leal
| United States of America |
| Alejandro Leal |
| 23-40119 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Monitoring for rulings on Motions pending in District Court to withdraw as counsel and to appoint new counsel filed 02/23/2023, document numbers 120 & 121, respectively. [23-40119] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/24/2023 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alejandro Leal. [23-40119] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/24/2023 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Leal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Alejandro Leal | |
| Represented By: | Roel Esquivel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
