Reginald StrotherIn re: Reginald Strother
| In re: Reginald Stanly Strother |
| 23-40142 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-40142] (DLM) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Reginald Stanly Strother to proceed in forma pauperis [3] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 02/21/2023 [23-40142] (DLM) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Reginald Stanly Strother for writ of mandamus [2] Ruling is requested by: 04/03/2023 Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/02/2023. Fee due on 04/03/2023 for Petitioner Reginald Stanly Strother. Date of Service: 02/20/2023 [23-40142] (DLM) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-40142] (DLM) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reginald StrotherIn re: Reginald Strother | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Reginald Stanly Strother | |
| Represented By: | Reginald Stanly Strother |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
