Reginald CampbellIn re: Reginald Campbell
Petitioner: In re: Reginald Vernard Campbell
Case Number: 23-40182
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2023 Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Comment: Per Attorney Advisor, Magistrate Judges are subject to Mandamus action. [23-40182] (DLM) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:14 PM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Reginald Vernard Campbell for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/27/2023. Fee due on 04/26/2023 for Petitioner Reginald Vernard Campbell. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 04/26/2023 for Petitioner Reginald Vernard Campbell. Date of Service: 03/20/2023. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a corrected certificate of service and filing fee [23-40182] (DLM) [Entered: 03/27/2023 11:24 AM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-40182] (DLM) [Entered: 03/27/2023 11:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reginald CampbellIn re: Reginald Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: Reginald Vernard Campbell
Represented By: Reginald Vernard Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?