Rodriguez v. City of Corpus Christi
| Annette Rodriguez |
| City of Corpus Christi |
| 23-40215 |
| April 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for dkt #104 - motion to certify interlocutory appeal. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-40215] (RLL) [Entered: 04/17/2023 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Annette Rodriguez. [23-40215] (RLL) [Entered: 04/11/2023 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. City of Corpus Christi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Annette Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Bryant Steven Banes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: City of Corpus Christi | |
| Represented By: | Brian Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
