Leobardo VillarrealIn re: Leobardo Villarreal
In re: Leobardo Villarreal |
23-40296 |
May 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-40296] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:47 PM] |
Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Leobardo Villarreal for writ of mandamus [2]. Petition NOT Sufficient for the following reasons: The Certificate of Service must include service upon Originating Court Judge; and a copy of any order or opinion, or parts of the record essential to the matters set forth in the petition is required. Date received in 5th Circuit: 05/08/2023. Fee due on 06/12/2023, for Petitioner Leobardo Villarreal. Sufficient Motion due on 06/12/2023, for Petitioner Leobardo Villarreal. Date of Service: 05/04/2023. [23-40296] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:25 PM] |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-40296] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Leobardo VillarrealIn re: Leobardo Villarreal | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Leobardo Villarreal | |
Represented By: | Leobardo Villarreal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.