USA v. Seay
| United States of America |
| Timothy Seay and Olga Matveeva |
| 23-40308 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to stay orders of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman dated 05/22/2023, document numbers 103, 104, 107, and 109 [ # 8 ], to vacate the decision of the district court orders 105 and 107 [ # 8 ], to order that the warrants issued 05/22/2023 remain under seal [ # 8 ], and for stay of report date to institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons until 06/21/2023 [ # 8 ], filed by Appellants Ms. Olga Matveeva and Mr. Timothy Seay. Date of Service: 05/24/2023. [23-40308] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/24/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellants Ms. Olga Matveeva and Mr. Timothy Seay to stay orders of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman dated 05/22/2023, document numbers 103, 104, 107, and 109 [8], to vacate the decision of the district court orders 105 and 107 [8], to order that the warrants issued 05/22/2023 remain under seal [8], and for stay of report date to institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons until 06/21/2023. Date of service: 05/24/2023. [23-40308] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/24/2023 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (IFPPDC). [23-40308] (ABT) [Entered: 05/23/2023 05:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Olga Matveeva and Mr. Timothy Seay [23-40308] (ABT) [Entered: 05/23/2023 03:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
