USA v. Brannan
| United States of America |
| William Randall Brannan |
| 23-40314 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-515 and 4:19-CR-77-1. Electronic ROA due on 08/09/2023. [23-40314] (RLL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 16 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 09/05/2023 for Appellant William Randall Brannan. Brief in Support due on 09/05/2023 for Appellant William Randall Brannan. Fee deadline updated to 09/05/2023 for Appellant William Randall Brannan. [23-40314] (RLL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 15 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/12/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. William Randall Brannan. [23-40314] (RLL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 14 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. William Randall Brannan. Fee deadline satisfied. [23-40314] (DLM) [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 13 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the correspondence received from Appellant Mr. William Randall Brannan asserting the distrcit court is not responding to his filings and requests for IFP forms. A review of the district court's docket confirms the filing of his handwritten motion for IFP and reflects his current address. We offer no response regarding the lack of response being sent to his filings by the district court. We will await a ruling on the motion for IFP motion before the appeal proceeds further. [23-40314] (DLM) [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 11 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. COA denied; fee due. [23-40314] (RLL) [Entered: 06/19/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/14/2023 denying COA for Appellant Mr. William Randall Brannan. [23-40314] (RLL) [Entered: 06/19/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bradley Elliot Visosky for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 23-40314 [23-40314] (ABT) [Entered: 06/13/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40314] (Bradley Elliot Visosky ) [Entered: 06/12/2023 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-40314] (NFD) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. William Randall Brannan [23-40314] (ABT) [Entered: 05/30/2023 03:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Brannan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Thomas Johnson |
| Represented By: | Bradley Elliot Visosky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: William Randall Brannan | |
| Represented By: | William Randall Brannan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
