City of Quitman, TexasIn re: City of Quitman, Texas
| In re: City of Quitman, Texas, Thomas Castloo, Wood County Sheriff, David Dobbs, City of Quitman Mayor, James Wheeler, Former Wood County District Attorney, Jeffrey Fletcher and Wood County, Texas |
| Terry Bevill |
| 23-40320 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTER filed by Petitioner Mr. James Wheeler referencing for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Mr. Thomas Castloo, City of Quitman, Texas, Mr. David Dobbs, Mr. Jeffrey Fletcher, Mr. James Wheeler and Wood County, Texas [ # 2 ], to stay district court proceedings filed by Petitioners Mr. Thomas Castloo, City of Quitman, Texas, Mr. David Dobbs, Mr. Jeffrey Fletcher, Mr. James Wheeler and Wood County, Texas [ # 2 ]. Date of Service: 06/01/2023 via email - Attorney for Petitioners: Blaies, Davis, Kercher, Vincent; Attorney for Respondent: Geisler [23-40320] (Grant David Blaies ) [Entered: 06/01/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-40320] (RLL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioners Mr. Thomas Castloo, City of Quitman, Texas, Mr. David Dobbs, Mr. Jeffrey Fletcher, Mr. James Wheeler and Wood County, Texas for writ of mandamus [2] Ruling is requested by: 06/05/2023 Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/01/2023, to stay district court proceedings. [2] [23-40320] (RLL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-40320] (RLL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
