Searcy v. Paxton
| Lisa Marie Searcy |
| Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Helen Truscott, Attorney, Jennifer Burnett, Attorney, Jana Wheeler, Attorney and Mark Aronowitz, Attorney |
| 23-40377 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Evidence to Support Appeals 23-40377 and 21-40602, received 08/10/2023, from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy, because we are unable to determine the relief sought. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 16 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Photos received 08/07/2023, from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy, because we are unable to determine the relief sought. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/08/2023 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-40377] (DDL) [Entered: 08/04/2023 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-CV-113. Electronic ROA due on 08/16/2023. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/01/2023 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief due on 09/11/2023, for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/01/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 14 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Evidence to Support Injuries received 07/26/2023, from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy, because there is no provision in this Court's Rules to allow the filing. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/02/2023 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy. Fee deadline satisfied. [23-40377] (DLM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Letter dated 7/13/23 seeking the consolidation of this appeal with appeal 21-40602 received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy, because appeal 21-40602 is a closed appeal. Advising that we will await ruling on her motion for IFP filed in the district court.. To the extent the letter contains argument in support of the merits of the appeal, the only place for its inclusion is in the filing of an appellant's brief once directed for filing. [23-40377] (DLM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the "Evidence to Support Rights Violations, Abuse of Discretion for Writ of Mandamus" received 07/13/2023, from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy, because the documents are not acceptable for filing in this case. This is not a mandamus proceeding. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/26/2023 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 07/14/2023 for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy [23-40377] (CCR) [Entered: 06/29/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF DEFENDANTS - APPELLEES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/22/2023 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy. [23-40377] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/22/2023 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
