Padieu v. Philips
| Philippe Padieu |
| Lisa Philips, Nurse Manager, Michael Sizemore, Senior Practice Manager, Kirt Stiefer, Warden, Beto Unit, Bobby Lumpkin, CID Director, Cheryl Egan, Catherine Chastain, Jacinta Assava and Chantelle Green |
| 23-40434 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the 8/17/23 correspondence received from Appellant Mr. Philippe Padieu seemingly asserting the filing fee for this appeal has been addressed, which it has not. While there is a refernce to the filing fee having been paid in case number 6:20cv6, that number is different from the case number in this appeal. To the extent he refers to having been granted IFPfor in filing the original complaint, that fee status will not carry over for appeal purposes. He will need to reapply for IFP instead. Further, the appeal will not be granted as indicated. It will instead be considered upon completion of the briefing schedule along with the merits of the appeal. [23-40434] (DLM) [Entered: 08/25/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/19/2023 for Appellant Philippe Padieu [23-40434] (ABT) [Entered: 07/26/2023 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Philippe Padieu [23-40434] (ABT) [Entered: 07/21/2023 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
