Riddle v. Lumpkin
Sammy Jay Riddle |
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
23-40437 |
July 26, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Sammy Jay Riddle. Extension Granted to and including 10/11/2023. Motion due deadline updated to 10/11/2023, for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle. Brief in Support deadline updated to 10/11/2023, for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle. [23-40437] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:20 PM] |
Filing 15 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Sammy Jay Riddle for filing COA motion and brief in support until 10/11/2023 [23-40437] (Josh Barrett Schaffer ) [Entered: 08/31/2023 02:39 PM] |
Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Nathan Tadema for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 23-40437 [23-40437] (ABT) [Entered: 08/30/2023 05:04 PM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40437] (Nathan Tadema ) [Entered: 08/30/2023 03:38 PM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Josh Barrett Schaffer for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle in 23-40437. [23-40437] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:19 AM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Josh Barrett Schaffer for Mr. Sammy Jay Riddle for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40437] (Josh Barrett Schaffer ) [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:26 PM] |
Filing 8 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 09/11/2023 for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle. Brief in Support due on 09/11/2023 for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle [23-40437] (DDL) [Entered: 07/31/2023 02:56 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-40437] (DDL) [Entered: 07/31/2023 02:56 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-330. Electronic ROA due on 08/11/2023. [23-40437] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/27/2023 04:12 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion due on 09/05/2023, for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle. Brief in Support due on 09/05/2023, for Appellant Sammy Jay Riddle. [23-40437] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/27/2023 04:08 PM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Sammy Jay Riddle. [23-40437] (RLL) [Entered: 07/26/2023 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Riddle v. Lumpkin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Sammy Jay Riddle | |
Represented By: | Josh Barrett Schaffer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Represented By: | Nathan Tadema |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.