Sposito v. Wheless
| Danielle D'vonne Sposito |
| Cynthia McCrann Wheless, Judge, Raymond G. Wheless, Administrative Judge and Emily Miskel, Judge |
| 23-40467 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK ORDER granting unopposed motion to extend time to file Appellant's brief, filed by Appellant Ms. Danielle D'vonne Sposito [ # 9 ]. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/24/2023, for Appellant Danielle D'vonne Sposito. [23-40467] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/22/2023 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Danielle D'vonne Sposito to extend time to file brief as Appellant until 10/24/2023 [9]. [23-40467] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/22/2023 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/25/2023 for Appellant Danielle D'vonne Sposito. [23-40467] (DDL) [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-40467] (DDL) [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-685. Electronic ROA due on 08/29/2023. [23-40467] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-40467] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Danielle D'vonne Sposito [23-40467] (ABT) [Entered: 08/11/2023 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
