M.A.C. v. Garza
M.A.C., a minor, by next friend Rosalinda Escobar |
Leonel Garza, Jr. |
23-40592 |
October 19, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/10/2024 for Appellant Leonel Garza Jr.. [23-40592] (DDL) [Entered: 12/01/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-40592] (DDL) [Entered: 12/01/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:22-CV-360. Electronic ROA due on 12/12/2023. [23-40592] (ABT) [Entered: 11/27/2023 07:55 AM] |
Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 11/20/2023 Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [23-40592] (ABT) [Entered: 11/27/2023 07:54 AM] |
Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Leonel Garza, Jr.. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 07/21/2023 , Motion Hearing 09/20/2023. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 11/20/2023 for Mary Henry, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 12 ] [23-40592] (CCR) [Entered: 11/08/2023 04:34 PM] |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Leonel Garza, Jr.for the Court to process. Date of service: 11/08/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Aguilar; Attorney for Appellee: Pena. [23-40592] (J. Arnold Aguilar ) [Entered: 11/08/2023 03:38 PM] |
Filing 11 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript order form received from Appellant Mr. Leonel Garza, Jr. because the form was incorrectly filed on the docket as a motion. The correct filing event for the Transcript Order Form must be used. [23-40592] (CCR) [Entered: 11/08/2023 03:16 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney J. Arnold Aguilar for Appellant Leonel Garza Jr. in 23-40592 [23-40592] (ABT) [Entered: 10/25/2023 11:49 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. J. Arnold Aguilar for Mr. Leonel Garza, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40592] (J. Arnold Aguilar ) [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:26 AM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/08/2023 for Appellant Leonel Garza Jr. [23-40592] (ABT) [Entered: 10/24/2023 08:51 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Leonel Garza, Jr. [23-40592] (RLL) [Entered: 10/20/2023 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: M.A.C. v. Garza | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: M.A.C., a minor, by next friend Rosalinda Escobar | |
Represented By: | Jay Pena |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Leonel Garza, Jr. | |
Represented By: | J. Arnold Aguilar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.