USA v. Hochman
United States of America |
Michael Avery Hochman, Medical Doctor |
23-40593 |
October 20, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-40593] (Adriana Arce-Flores ) [Entered: 10/23/2023 01:41 PM] |
Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40593] (Michael Emory Clark ) [Entered: 10/23/2023 12:49 PM] |
Filing 17 Attorney Michael Clark is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The revised Notice of Appearance Form must be used. [23-40593] (LBM) [Entered: 10/23/2023 11:53 AM] |
Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40593] (Michael Emory Clark ) [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:38 AM] |
Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Eileen K. Wilson for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 23-40593, by Attorney Roberto Balli for Appellant Michael Avery Hochman in 23-40593 [23-40593] (ABT) [Entered: 10/23/2023 08:50 AM] |
Filing 12 COURT DIRECTIVE ISSUED requesting a response to the Motion for extraordinary relief filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Avery Hochman in 23-40593 [ # 8 ] Response/Opposition due on Wednesday, 10/25/2023 by 12pm Noon CST. Any Reply to the Response is due on Thursday, 10/26/2023 by 5pm CST. [23-40593] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/21/2023 10:26 AM] |
Filing 8 OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Avery Hochman Review of the Denial of Emergency Motion to Modify the Conditions of Release [8]. Date of service: 10/20/2023 Response/Opposition due on 10/30/2023. [23-40593] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Avery Hochman for bail pending appeal [8] Ruling is requested by: 10/27/2023. Date of service: 10/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Balli; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell [23-40593] (Roberto Balli ) [Entered: 10/20/2023 03:56 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Roberto Balli for Mr. Michael Avery Hochman for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-40593] (Roberto Balli ) [Entered: 10/20/2023 02:38 PM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-40593] (Eileen K. Wilson ) [Entered: 10/20/2023 02:15 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Bail memo due on 10/30/2023 for Appellant Michael Avery Hochman. [23-40593] (ABT) [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:35 AM] |
Filing 1 NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Avery Hochman [23-40593] (ABT) [Entered: 10/20/2023 08:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Hochman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Eileen K. Wilson |
Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Michael Avery Hochman, Medical Doctor | |
Represented By: | Roberto Balli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.