USA v. Bennett
United States of America |
Mary Francis Chupick Bennett |
23-40680 |
November 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Land Condemnation |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. Extension Granted to and including 02/22/2024. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/22/2024, for Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 01/12/2024 12:44 PM] |
Filing 23 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett for filing Brief of Appellant until 02/22/2024 [23-40680] (Richard Barrett Phillips Jr.) [Entered: 01/12/2024 12:33 PM] |
Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Richard Barrett Phillips Jr. for Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett in 23-40680 [23-40680] (CCR) [Entered: 01/02/2024 12:10 PM] |
Filing 19 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/23/2024 for Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. [23-40680] (DDL) [Entered: 12/14/2023 07:58 AM] |
Filing 18 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-40680] (DDL) [Entered: 12/14/2023 07:58 AM] |
Filing 17 FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. Fee deadline satisfied. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 12/13/2023 02:41 PM] |
Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jared C. Lampson for party(s) Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett, in case 23-40680 [23-40680] (AMD) [Entered: 12/07/2023 03:18 PM] |
Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Richard Barrett Phillips Jr. for party(s) Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett, in case 23-40680 [23-40680] (AMD) [Entered: 12/07/2023 03:04 PM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-40680] (Jared C. Lampson ) [Entered: 12/07/2023 11:11 AM] |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:20-CV-166. Electronic ROA due on 12/22/2023. [23-40680] (ABT) [Entered: 12/07/2023 08:04 AM] |
Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-40680] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 12/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Iglesias, Salazar, Smeltzer; Attorney for Appellant: Phillips [23-40680] (Richard Barrett Phillips Jr.) [Entered: 12/06/2023 03:04 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Richard Barrett Phillips, Jr. for Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-40680] (Richard Barrett Phillips Jr.) [Entered: 12/06/2023 03:02 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Luther Smeltzer for Appellee USA in 23-40680. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/30/2023 08:08 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Baltazar Salazar for Appellee USA in 23-40680. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/30/2023 08:06 AM] |
Filing 5 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/29/2023 04:15 PM] |
Filing 4 PERMISSION TO APPEAL GRANTED. Case transferred from miscellaneous case number 23-90032, to general docket appeal case number 23-40680. Fee due on 12/13/2023, for Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. Transcript order due on 12/14/2023, for Appellant Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/29/2023 03:33 PM] |
Filing 1 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Mary Francis Chupick Bennett. [23-40680] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/29/2023 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.