Wood v. City of San Antonio
| Amanda Wood |
| City of San Antonio, Martha Martinez, San Antonio Police Department Officer and J. Ortiz, San Antonio Police Department Officer |
| 23-50037 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Noe Javier Saucedo for party(s) Appellee City of San Antonio, in case 23-50037 [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 02/28/2023 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 23 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-50037] (Noe Javier Saucedo ) [Entered: 02/23/2023 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 21 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Amanda Wood. Extension Granted to and including 04/20/2023. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 04/20/2023 for Appellant Amanda Wood [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 20 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Ms. Amanda Wood for filing Appellant Counsel's Request for an Extension of time to file Opening Brief until 04/20/2023 [23-50037] (Andres Roberto Cano ) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:41 AM] |
| Filing 22 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appearance form from Mark Kosanovich because per counsel filed in error - duplicate [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 02/16/2023 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 18 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/21/2023 for Appellant Amanda Wood. [23-50037] (DDL) [Entered: 02/09/2023 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50037] (DDL) [Entered: 02/09/2023 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jacqueline Marie Stroh for party(s) Appellee City of San Antonio, in case 23-50037 [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 02/07/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50037] (Jacqueline Marie Stroh ) [Entered: 02/05/2023 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Mark Kosanovich for Appellee J. Ortiz in 23-50037, Attorney Mark Kosanovich for Appellee Martha Martinez in 23-50037 [23-50037] (PAC) [Entered: 01/25/2023 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andres Roberto Cano for Appellant Amanda Wood in 23-50037 [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 01/24/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Mark Kosanovich for Ms. Martha Martinez and Mr. J. Ortiz for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50037] (Mark Kosanovich ) [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:21-CV-187. Electronic ROA due on 02/07/2023. [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-50037] (MBC) [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [23-50037] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Amanda Wood advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 01/20/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cano; Attorney for Appellees: Kosanovich, Ralls [23-50037] (Andres Roberto Cano ) [Entered: 01/20/2023 08:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50037] (Andres Roberto Cano ) [Entered: 01/20/2023 08:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Amanda Wood [23-50037] (AS) [Entered: 01/18/2023 02:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
