Nelson v. TX Dept of Trans
| Richard Nelson |
| Texas Department of Transportation |
| 23-50328 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Richard Nelson. Extension Granted to and including 07/27/2023. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/27/2023 for Appellant Richard Nelson [23-50328] (MFY) [Entered: 06/19/2023 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 13 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Richard Nelson for filing Appellant Brief until 07/27/2023 [23-50328] (John F. Melton ) [Entered: 06/15/2023 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Amy Owen is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:she is no longer with AG's office. [23-50328] (AS) [Entered: 05/23/2023 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/27/2023 for Appellant Richard Nelson. [23-50328] (DDL) [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50328] (DDL) [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:22-CV-34. Electronic ROA due on 05/26/2023. [23-50328] (PAC) [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John F. Melton for Appellant Richard Nelson in 23-50328 [23-50328] (PAC) [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. John F. Melton for Mr. Richard Nelson for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50328] (John F. Melton ) [Entered: 05/11/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-50328] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Richard Nelson advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 05/11/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Melton; Attorney for Appellees: Owens, Zuercher [23-50328] (John F. Melton ) [Entered: 05/11/2023 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/24/2023 for Appellant Richard Nelson [23-50328] (RSM) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Nelson [23-50328] (AS) [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nelson v. TX Dept of Trans | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Richard Nelson | |
| Represented By: | John F. Melton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Texas Department of Transportation | |
| Represented By: | Amy Michelle Owens Esq. |
| Represented By: | John Michael Zuercher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
