Guillory v. Ruhnke
| Ronald Guillory, Jr. |
| Gregory M. Ruhnke and Steven Hilbig |
| 23-50392 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Proceed IFP received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Guillory, Jr. in light of the clerk's order of July 7, 2023 [23-50392] (MRW) [Entered: 07/11/2023 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9] [23-50392] (MFY) [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 06/26/2023 for Appellant Ronald Guillory Jr. [23-50392] (MFY) [Entered: 06/15/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Guillory, Jr. for appointment of investigator [7]. [23-50392] (MRW) [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Guillory, Jr. to appoint counsel [6]. [23-50392] (MRW) [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/09/2023 for Appellant Ronald Guillory Jr. [23-50392] (MRW) [Entered: 05/25/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Guillory, Jr. [23-50392] (LEF) [Entered: 05/23/2023 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
