Natividad v. Lumpkin
| Ernesto L. Natividad |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 23-50396 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ernesto L. Natividad to amend Brief Supporting Document [ # 12 ] [17]. [23-50396] (MRW) [Entered: 07/10/2023 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Ernesto L. Natividad in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [12] [23-50396] (MRW) [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Marta Rew McLaughlin for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 23-50396 [23-50396] (LEF) [Entered: 06/28/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Marta Rew McLaughlin for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50396] (Marta Rew McLaughlin ) [Entered: 06/28/2023 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ernesto L. Natividad for certificate of appealability [9]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [23-50396] (MRW) [Entered: 06/21/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ernesto L. Natividad to proceed in forma pauperis [8] Fee deadline canceled. [23-50396] (MRW) [Entered: 06/21/2023 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50396] (DDL) [Entered: 06/19/2023 07:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:22-CV-216. Electronic ROA due on 06/09/2023. [23-50396] (LEF) [Entered: 05/25/2023 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee deadline updated to 07/05/2023 for Appellant Ernesto L. Natividad. Motion due on 07/05/2023 for Appellant Ernesto L. Natividad. Brief in Support due on 07/05/2023 for Appellant Ernesto L. Natividad [23-50396] (LEF) [Entered: 05/25/2023 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ernesto L. Natividad [23-50396] (LEF) [Entered: 05/24/2023 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Natividad v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Ernesto L. Natividad | |
| Represented By: | Ernesto L. Natividad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Marta Rew McLaughlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
