Baksic v. Ethicon
| Danielle Baksic and Brian Baksic |
| Ethicon, Incorporated and Johnson & Johnson |
| 23-50474 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| P.I. - Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Mr. Brian Baksic and Ms. Danielle Baksic. Extension Granted to and including 10/06/2023. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/06/2023 for Appellants Brian Baksic and Danielle Baksic [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 08/08/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Mr. Brian Baksic and Ms. Danielle Baksic for filing Request for Extension to File Brief and Record Excerpts until 10/06/2023 [23-50474] (Sheila M. Bossier ) [Entered: 08/08/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 22 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/06/2023 for Appellants Brian Baksic and Danielle Baksic. [23-50474] (DDL) [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 21 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50474] (DDL) [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Marshall Ayres Bowen for party(s) Appellee Ethicon, Incorporated Appellee Johnson & Johnson, in case 23-50474 [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/13/2023 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-920. Electronic ROA due on 07/26/2023. [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-50474] No hearings. (MBC) [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-50474] (Marshall Ayres Bowen ) [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. Brian Baksic and Ms. Danielle Baksicfor the Court to process. Date of service: 07/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bossier, Harris; Attorney for Appellees: Modak-Truran, Moldoveanu; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Modak-Truran. [23-50474] (Sheila M. Bossier ) [Entered: 07/06/2023 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Laurel Li Harris for party(s) Appellant Danielle Baksic Appellant Brian Baksic, in case 23-50474 [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Sheila M. Bossier for Appellant Brian Baksic in 23-50474, Attorney Sheila M. Bossier for Appellant Danielle Baksic in 23-50474 [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Susanna Moore Moldoveanu for party(s) Appellee Ethicon, Incorporated Appellee Johnson & Johnson, in case 23-50474 [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/05/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [8] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/18/2023 for Appellants Brian Baksic and Danielle Baksic [23-50474] (MBC) [Entered: 07/03/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-50474] (Laurel Li Harris ) [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50474] (Sheila M. Bossier ) [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50474] (Susanna Moore Moldoveanu ) [Entered: 06/30/2023 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Brian Baksic and Ms. Danielle Baksic [23-50474] (CAS) [Entered: 06/23/2023 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
