Hamilton v. City of Lott, TX
Michael R. Hamilton |
City of Lott, Texas |
23-50498 |
July 10, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 [23-50498] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Michael R. Hamilton. Date of service: 09/03/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Rivera; Attorney for Appellant: Schleicher [23-50498] (David R. Schleicher ) [Entered: 09/03/2023 12:36 PM] |
Filing 13 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 10/03/2023 for Appellee City of Lott, Texas [23-50498] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Michael R. Hamilton. Date of service: 09/03/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Rivera; Attorney for Appellant: Schleicher [23-50498] (David R. Schleicher ) [Entered: 09/03/2023 12:34 PM] |
Filing 12 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/05/2023 for Appellant Michael R. Hamilton. [23-50498] (DDL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:12 PM] |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50498] (DDL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:12 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David R. Schleicher for Appellant Michael R. Hamilton in 23-50498 [23-50498] (RSM) [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:15 AM] |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:22-CV-1292. Electronic ROA due on 07/28/2023. [23-50498] (LEF) [Entered: 07/13/2023 03:39 PM] |
Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-50498] (LEF) [Entered: 07/13/2023 03:37 PM] |
Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [23-50498] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Michael R. Hamilton advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 07/13/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Rivera; Attorney for Appellant: Schleicher [23-50498] (David R. Schleicher ) [Entered: 07/13/2023 01:52 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. David R. Schleicher, Esq. for Mr. Michael R. Hamilton for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50498] (David R. Schleicher ) [Entered: 07/13/2023 01:44 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael R. Hamilton [23-50498] (LEF) [Entered: 07/10/2023 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Hamilton v. City of Lott, TX | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Michael R. Hamilton | |
Represented By: | David R. Schleicher Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: City of Lott, Texas | |
Represented By: | Joe Anthony Rivera Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.