Mays v. City of Lakeway
Richard Mays |
City of Lakeway, Texas |
23-50759 |
October 27, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE RECEIVED from Angela Hailey that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Richard Mays is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [23-50759] (Angela Hailey ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:55 PM] |
Filing 18 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [23-50759] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Richard Mays advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/06/2023 via clerk - Attorney for Appellees: Caputo, Seaquist [23-50759] (Richard Mays ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:24 PM] |
Filing 17 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Mays [ # 13 ] [23-50759] (LEF) [Entered: 11/06/2023 01:10 PM] |
Filing 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Mays for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [13]. Date of service: 11/02/2023 [23-50759] (LEF) [Entered: 11/06/2023 10:53 AM] |
Filing 12 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/12/2023 for Appellant Richard Mays. [23-50759] (DDL) [Entered: 11/02/2023 11:24 AM] |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50759] (DDL) [Entered: 11/02/2023 11:23 AM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gunnar P. Seaquist for party(s) Appellee City of Lakeway, Texas, in case 23-50759 [23-50759] (LEF) [Entered: 10/31/2023 04:38 PM] |
Filing 9 Attorney Gunnar P. Seaquist Joshua D. Katz is advised to resubmit an appearance form. [23-50759] (CJM) [Entered: 10/31/2023 01:28 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-50759] (Gunnar P. Seaquist ) [Entered: 10/30/2023 05:30 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50759] (Gunnar P. Seaquist ) [Entered: 10/30/2023 05:21 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:23-CV-322. Electronic ROA due on 11/14/2023. [23-50759] (LEF) [Entered: 10/30/2023 04:25 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-50759] (LEF) [Entered: 10/30/2023 04:23 PM] |
Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Mays [23-50759] (MVM) [Entered: 10/27/2023 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Mays v. City of Lakeway | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Richard Mays | |
Represented By: | Richard Mays |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: City of Lakeway, Texas | |
Represented By: | Cobby A. Caputo |
Represented By: | Gunnar P. Seaquist Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.