Murray v. Lumpkin
| Allen John Murray |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 23-50776 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:18-CV-1288. Electronic ROA due on 01/10/2024. [23-50776] (MVM) [Entered: 12/26/2023 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 15 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 02/05/2024 for Appellant Allen John Murray. Brief in Support due on 02/05/2024 for Appellant Allen John Murray. Fee deadline updated to 02/05/2024 for Appellant Allen John Murray [23-50776] (MVM) [Entered: 12/26/2023 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 14 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/15/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray. [23-50776] (MVM) [Entered: 12/26/2023 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 12 ]. [13] [23-50776] (MRW) [Entered: 12/18/2023 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray for certificate of appealability [12]. [23-50776] (MRW) [Entered: 12/18/2023 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray. [23-50776] (MBC) [Entered: 12/06/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising to disregard the clerk's notice of 11/1/23 [23-50776] (MRW) [Entered: 11/27/2023 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray to the District Court for filing. [23-50776] (MRW) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50776] (MRW) [Entered: 11/17/2023 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:18-CV-1288. Electronic ROA due on 11/16/2023. [23-50776] (JJF) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-50776] (JJF) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Allen John Murray [23-50776] (JJF) [Entered: 10/31/2023 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Murray v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Allen John Murray | |
| Represented By: | Allen John Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Miranda Harp |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
