Brady v. DOWCP
| Kevin Brady |
| Texas Termainal, L.P., Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor |
| 23-60064 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for DOWCP in 23-60064. [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amanda Torres for party(s) Respondent DOWCP, in case 23-60064. [23-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/14/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60064] (Amanda Torres ) [Entered: 02/14/2023 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of filed by Petitioner Mr. Kevin Brady Date of Service: 02/10/2023 [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 05:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney added Respondent DOWCP in 23-60064 [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 Attorney added Respondent DOWCP in 23-60064 [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Kevin Brady. Date received in 5th Circuit: 02/07/2023. Fee due on 02/28/2023 for Petitioner Kevin Brady. Statement of Issues due on 03/15/2023 for Petitioner Kevin Brady. Administrative Record due on 03/27/2023 [23-60064] (MAS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
