Pinkston v. MTC
| Chaz Pinkston |
| MTC, Hector Portillo, Programs Director Becky Turcotte, Director of Programs, Christopher Dykes, Deputy Warden Ray Rice, Deputy Warden of Programs, Regional Director Robyn Williams, M.T.C. Director of State, Shericka Nelson and Vernell Thomas, M.D.O.C. (on site) Contract Monitor |
| 23-60133 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Brittney Eakins is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:no longer with AG's Office. [23-60133] (AGL) [Entered: 04/26/2023 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) James Henderson Hall for party(s) Appellee Vernell Thomas, in case 23-60133 [23-60133] (AGL) [Entered: 04/26/2023 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60133] (James Henderson Hall ) [Entered: 04/26/2023 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/18/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Chaz Pinkston because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 05/19/2023 for Appellant Chaz Pinkston [23-60133] (MRW) [Entered: 04/19/2023 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/16/2023 for Appellant Chaz Pinkston [23-60133] (CAS) [Entered: 03/22/2023 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chaz Pinkston [23-60133] (CAS) [Entered: 03/20/2023 01:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
