Zimmerman v. Fed Bur of Prisons
Jack Zimmerman |
Federal Bureau of Prisons |
23-60242 |
May 8, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman in 23-60242 [ # 17 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/30/2023 02:30 PM] |
Filing 18 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Extension of Time received from Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman because the motion crossed in the mail with the clerk's notice of June 2, 2023 [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/15/2023 08:55 AM] |
Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman to proceed in forma pauperis [17] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 07/05/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman. [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/15/2023 08:45 AM] |
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-60242] (DDL) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:19 PM] |
Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-314. Electronic ROA due on 06/20/2023. [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:21 AM] |
Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED Fee deadline updated to 07/12/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman. A/Pet's Brief due on 07/12/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman. [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:18 AM] |
Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/31/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman. Fee due on 06/20/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman [23-60242] (MRW) [Entered: 06/02/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 12 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process (additional appeal). [12] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/01/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman [23-60242] (AGL) [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:44 AM] |
Filing 8 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman. [23-60242] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/16/2023 03:41 PM] |
Filing 7 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [7] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman. [7] [23-60242] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/16/2023 03:41 PM] |
Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 06/08/2023 for Appellant Jack Zimmerman (signed notice of appeal) [23-60242] (AGL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 12:17 PM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jack Zimmerman [23-60242] (MAS) [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Zimmerman v. Fed Bur of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Jack Zimmerman | |
Represented By: | Jack Zimmerman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.