Fasken Land and Minerals v. NRC
Petitioner: Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners
Respondent: Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Case Number: 23-60377
Filed: July 11, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 27, 2024 Fasken Land and Minerals v. NRC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2023 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Andrew Paul Averbach ) [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:52 AM]
July 12, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Allan L. Kanner for Petitioner Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners in 23-60377, Attorney Allan L. Kanner for Petitioner Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited in 23-60377 [23-60377] (MRW) [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:08 AM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Allan L. Kanner, Esq. for Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Allan L. Kanner ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 04:38 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Andrew Paul Averbach ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:41 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 2 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for Review filed by Petitioners Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Date of Service: 07/07/2023 [23-60377] (WMJ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:34 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners. Date received in 5th Circuit: 07/07/2023. Administrative Record due on 08/21/2023 [23-60377] (WMJ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fasken Land and Minerals v. NRC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited
Represented By: Allan L. Kanner Esq.
Represented By: Annemieke Monique Tennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners
Represented By: Allan L. Kanner Esq.
Represented By: Annemieke Monique Tennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Represented By: Andrew Paul Averbach Esq.
Represented By: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Andrew Paul Averbach Esq.
Represented By: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?