Fasken Land and Minerals v. NRC
Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners |
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America |
23-60377 |
July 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Andrew Paul Averbach ) [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:52 AM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Allan L. Kanner for Petitioner Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners in 23-60377, Attorney Allan L. Kanner for Petitioner Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited in 23-60377 [23-60377] (MRW) [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:08 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Allan L. Kanner, Esq. for Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Allan L. Kanner ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 04:38 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60377] (Andrew Paul Averbach ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:41 PM] |
Filing 2 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for Review filed by Petitioners Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Date of Service: 07/07/2023 [23-60377] (WMJ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:34 PM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners. Date received in 5th Circuit: 07/07/2023. Administrative Record due on 08/21/2023 [23-60377] (WMJ) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.