Diaz-Pajardo v. Garland
Petitioner: Elsa Diaz-Pajardo
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Case Number: 23-60437
Filed: August 11, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 27, 2024 Diaz-Pajardo v. Garland

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2023 Filing 12 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [12] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-60437] (MAS) [Entered: 08/14/2023 04:40 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE OF INTENT TO DEPORT The petitioner is not in custody and is not yet scheduled for removal. Notice of Intent Due deadline satisfied. [23-60437] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: NOTICE OF INTENT TO DEPORT filed by Respondent Mr. Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General. The petitioner is not in custody and is not yet scheduled for removal. Date of Service: 08/14/2023 via US mail - Petitioner Diaz-Pajardo; email - Attorney for Respondents: Hardy, OIL. [23-60437] (Joseph D. Hardy ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 12:35 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-60437] (Anthony Cardozo Payne ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 09:55 AM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 7 Attorney Joseph Hardy added as counsel of record for Respondent Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General in 23-60437 [23-60437] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/14/2023 08:08 AM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ms. Elsa Diaz-Pajardo for stay of removal [4] Notice of Intent Due on 08/16/2023 for Respondent Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General. Date of service: 07/31/2023 Response/Opposition due on 08/21/2023. [23-60437] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:12 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Petitioner Ms. Elsa Diaz-Pajardo in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Ms. Elsa Diaz-Pajardo in 23-60437 [ # 2 ]. Affidavit is insufficient for the following reasons: Does not state issues on appeal. PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Miscellaneous due on 09/06/2023 for Petitioner Elsa Diaz-Pajardo [23-60437] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:07 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ms. Elsa Diaz-Pajardo to proceed in forma pauperis [2]. Date of service: 07/31/2023 [23-60437] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:03 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Ms. Elsa Diaz-Pajardo. Date received in 5th Circuit: 08/08/2023. Immigration File Number: a098 488 759 Administrative Record due on 09/20/2023 [23-60437] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/11/2023 05:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Diaz-Pajardo v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Elsa Diaz-Pajardo
Represented By: Elsa Diaz-Pajardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Represented By: Joseph D. Hardy
Represented By: Office of Immigration Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?