North MS Med Ctr v. Quartiz
Plaintiff / Appellee: North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant: Quartiz Technologies, doing business as Value Ascent, Incorporated
Case Number: 23-60483
Filed: September 11, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2023 Filing 22 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/13/2023 for Appellant Quartiz Technologies. [23-60483] (DDL) [Entered: 11/03/2023 04:07 PM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 21 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-60483] (DDL) [Entered: 11/03/2023 04:06 PM]
October 31, 2023 Filing 20 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:23-CV-3. Electronic ROA due on 11/15/2023. [23-60483] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:45 AM]
October 31, 2023 Filing 19 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Candice Crane, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 10/30/2023 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [23-60483] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:45 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andrew Coffman for Appellee North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated in 23-60483 [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/26/2023 03:55 PM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Mark Nolan Halbert for Appellee North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated in 23-60483 [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/26/2023 02:11 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Candice Crane, Est. Completion Dt: 10/25/2023, Est. No.of Pgs: 40, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 09/02/2005, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 10/25/2023, Proceeding Type and Date: Evidentiary Hearing 05/16/2023. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 10/25/2023 for Candice Crane [23-60483] (There was no court reporter present on 5/18/23 and no transcript to be filed) (AGL) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:37 PM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Andrew Coffman for North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-60483] (Andrew Coffman ) [Entered: 09/25/2023 11:31 AM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Mark Nolan Halbert for North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60483] (Mark Nolan Halbert ) [Entered: 09/25/2023 11:28 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Quartiz Technologies advising transcripts of 3/27/23 Motion Hearing, 7/14/23 Evidentiary Hearing, and 7/21/23 Evidentiary Hearing are unnecessary as they are already filed. [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/22/2023 08:16 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Quartiz Technologies. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Candice Crane, Proceeding Type and Date: Evidentiary Hearing 05/16/2023 , Evidentiary Hearing 05/18/2023. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 10/02/2023 for Candice Crane. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 8 ] [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/22/2023 08:13 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Taylor Hamilton Webb for Appellant Quartiz Technologies in 23-60483 [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/21/2023 03:07 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 9 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Quartiz Technologiesfor the Court to process. Date of service: 09/21/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coffman, Halbert; Attorney for Appellant: Webb. [23-60483] (Taylor Hamilton Webb ) [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:12 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 8 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Quartiz Technologiesfor the Court to process. Date of service: 09/21/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coffman, Halbert; Attorney for Appellant: Webb. [23-60483] (Taylor Hamilton Webb ) [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:06 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Taylor Hamilton Webb for Quartiz Technologies for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60483] (Taylor Hamilton Webb ) [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:01 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/28/2023 for Appellant Quartiz Technologies [23-60483] (AGL) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:22 AM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Quartiz Technologies. [23-60483] (CAG) [Entered: 09/11/2023 10:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: North MS Med Ctr v. Quartiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: North Mississippi Medical Center, Incorporated
Represented By: Andrew Coffman
Represented By: Mark Nolan Halbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Quartiz Technologies, doing business as Value Ascent, Incorporated
Represented By: Taylor Hamilton Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?