USA v. Brown
United States of America |
Marcus D. Brown |
23-60585 |
November 15, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Paul David Roberts for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-60585] (Paul David Roberts ) [Entered: 11/16/2023 04:30 PM] |
Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 11/30/2023 for Appellant Marcus D. Brown [23-60585] (AMD) [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:57 PM] |
Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus D. Brown [23-60585] (AMD) [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Brown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Paul David Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Marcus D. Brown | |
Represented By: | Gregory Scott Park |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.