Scott v. Vital Core Strategies
| Jacob Blair Scott |
| Vital Core Strategies, Mike Ezell, Sheriff, individual and official capacity, Tyrone Nelson, Captain, individual and official capacity, Amanda Harris, Vital Core, individual and official capacity, Geneva Drummond, Deputy, individual and official capacity, Angie Hand, Vital Core, individual and official capacity, John Barnes, individual and official capacity and CT Corporation Systems |
| 23-60599 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. It has come to the court's attention that the Fee due deadline for Appellant Jacob Blair Scott was inadvertently set for the wrong date. In light of this, the fee deadline is updated from the day the letter sent. Fee due for Appellant Jacob Blair Scott on 01/22/2024. [23-60599] (CAG) [Entered: 12/15/2023 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Jacob Blair Scott. Extension Granted to and including 12/28/2023. Fee deadline updated to 12/28/2023 for Appellant Jacob Blair Scott [23-60599] (CAG) [Entered: 12/14/2023 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 12/13/2023 for Appellant Jacob Blair Scott [23-60599] (JJF) [Entered: 11/28/2023 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Blair Scott [23-60599] (JJF) [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
