Dillard v. Davis
| Daniel D. Dillard |
| Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden, Andrea B. Lozada, former Assistant Warden, Cody S. Miller, Captain, Bryan D. Reitsma, former Captain, Shon McGee, Lieutenant, Gregory S. Fredricks, Dakota R. Denney, Jayton W. Chavers, James Bullard, Timothy Washington, Major, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Michael E. Feazell, current Assistant Warden and Timothy S. Hooper, current Assistant Warden |
| 24-10006 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel D. Dillard [ # 6 ] [24-10006] (MRW) [Entered: 02/06/2024 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel D. Dillard to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [6]. [24-10006] (MRW) [Entered: 02/06/2024 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 03/05/2024 for Appellant Daniel D. Dillard [24-10006] (JJF) [Entered: 01/10/2024 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel D. Dillard [24-10006] (JJF) [Entered: 01/04/2024 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
