Hodge v. Zimmerman
| Theotis Lee Hodge |
| Dustin Zimmerman, Correctional Officer V, Sergeant, James Judd, Captain, James Villegas, Major, Shelia Briscoe, Stephanie Patton, Head Grievance Investigator, Justin Perez, Counsel Substitute, Vickie Brown, Counsel Substitute II, Amy Garcia, Head of Classification, Angelique Turner, Grievance, Timothy Hooper, Assistant Warden, Kim Massey, Classification and J. Rilley, Central Grievance Officer |
| 24-10066 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Theotis Lee Hodge [ # 7 ] Fee deadline updated to 04/09/2024 for Appellant Theotis Lee Hodge [24-10066] (MRW) [Entered: 03/26/2024 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Theotis Lee Hodge to extend time to pay filing fee [7]. [24-10066] (MRW) [Entered: 03/26/2024 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Extension of Time received from Appellant Mr. Theotis Lee Hodge because the motion is premature [24-10066] (MRW) [Entered: 02/28/2024 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 03/25/2024 for Appellant Theotis Lee Hodge [24-10066] (RCB) [Entered: 01/30/2024 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Theotis Lee Hodge [24-10066] (RCB) [Entered: 01/29/2024 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
