Vallejo v. Coldwell Banker
| Ed Vallejo and Beisa Vallejo |
| Coldwell Banker, Rick Hatzler, Jana Townsley and Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, not in it individual capacity but soley as owner trustee for Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1 |
| 24-10256 |
| March 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Personal Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the request for judicial notice of request to proceed in forma pauperis incorrectly filed as a letter received from Appellants Mrs. Beisa Vallejo and Mr. Ed Vallejo because this case was dismissed for failure to pay the fee. If you wish to reopen this case a motion to reopen must be filed with this court [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 20 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to appoint counsel received from Appellants Mrs. Beisa Vallejo and Mr. Ed Vallejo because this case was dismissed on May 8, 2024 for failure to pay the fee. It is closed. If you wish to reopen this case a motion to reopen is needed and the deficiency must be remedied (fee must be paid in district court or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed in the district court [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 05/08/2024 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [17] [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 05/08/2024 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 16 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to file electronically received from Appellant Mr. Ed Vallejo because it is unnecessary. The previous motion to file electronically was granted on April 10, 2024 [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/22/2024 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 15 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/12/2024 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 14 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/27/2024 denying motion for reconsideration Fee deadline updated to 04/29/2024 for Appellants Beisa Vallejo and Ed Vallejo [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/12/2024 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 13 FED. R. APP. P. 44 Notice of Challenge to Constitutionality of Statute. [24-10256] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: FED. R. APP. P. 44 Notice of Challenge to Constitutionality of Statute filed by Appellant Mr. Ed Vallejo. Date of Service: 04/12/2024 via email - Appellants Vallejo, Vallejo; clerk - Appellants Vallejo, Vallejo [24-10256] (Ed Vallejo ) [Entered: 04/12/2024 06:51 AM] |
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Ed Vallejo [ # 8 ] [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/10/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the notice and motion to file electronically received from Appellants Mrs. Beisa Vallejo and Mr. Ed Vallejo because it was incorrectly submitted for filing via CM/ECF Utilities [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/08/2024 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ed Vallejo for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [8]. Date of service: 03/29/2024 [24-10256] (LEF) [Entered: 04/10/2024 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for motion for reconsideration. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [24-10256] (RA) [Entered: 03/27/2024 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mrs. Beisa Vallejo and Mr. Ed Vallejo [24-10256] (RCB) [Entered: 03/26/2024 11:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
